‘Acting Like a Spoilt Kid’: Ben Stokes Faces Backlash Over Harry Brook Bowling Move After Handshake Controversy

‘Acting Like a Spoilt Kid’: Ben Stokes Faces Backlash Over Harry Brook Bowling Move After Handshake Controversy

England Test captain Ben Stokes has found himself at the centre of a fiery cricketing storm following a bizarre sequence of events in the recently concluded Test against India. From refusing a customary post-match handshake to controversially handing the ball to part-time spinner Harry Brook in a critical phase, Stokes’ conduct has sparked a flurry of criticism — with some even branding him a “spoilt kid” unwilling to accept defeat.

The ‘Handshake’ Row That Started It All

It all began when the Indian team, having secured a hard-fought win, gathered at the centre expecting the traditional end-of-match handshake. Surprisingly, Stokes and a few England players reportedly walked off the field, skipping the courtesy entirely. The act, which deviated from cricket’s deeply rooted gentlemanly traditions, didn’t go unnoticed.

While Stokes later clarified that he was upset with India’s “gamesmanship” — allegedly referring to delays and fielding tactics — many saw it as unsportsmanlike behaviour unbecoming of a leader.

Then Came the Harry Brook Decision

As if the handshake snub wasn’t enough, things escalated further when, during a crucial stretch on Day 4, Stokes handed the ball to Harry Brook, a player with limited bowling experience in red-ball cricket. The move, seen by many as a sign of protest or surrender, raised eyebrows both in the commentary box and among fans.

Brook, clearly not ready for such a situation, was smashed for 18 runs in an over, shifting the momentum permanently in India’s favour.

Fans & Pundits Unleash Fury

Social media exploded as soon as highlights of the over surfaced. From sarcastic memes to sharp criticism, the cricketing world didn’t hold back:

• “Ben Stokes bowling Harry Brook instead of Root or Anderson? That’s playground captaincy.”
• “Walking off without a handshake and then tossing the ball to a rookie? Stokes is acting like a spoilt kid.”
• “Is this tactical innovation or sheer ego?”

Even former England captain Michael Vaughan weighed in subtly during commentary, saying,

“You need to win games with maturity, not with tantrums. These are Tests, not trials.”

Indian legend Sunil Gavaskar, too, didn’t mince his words:

“If you can’t take the heat, don’t play the game. What Stokes did reflects poorly on England’s cricket culture.”

Was It Poor Leadership or Psychological Warfare?

Stokes’ defenders argue that his actions were a form of psychological gamesmanship, intended to throw the Indians off rhythm and regain some mental ground after a tough series. They point out that Brook’s over could have been a gamble to break a partnership, and the handshake refusal a reaction to India’s own aggressive on-field sledging.

However, critics counter that such behaviour crosses the line from strategy to petulance, especially coming from a player as experienced and respected as Ben Stokes.

Pressure Getting to England?

With the Test series slipping out of England’s hands and their aggressive ‘Bazball’ tactics facing scrutiny, many believe Stokes is cracking under pressure. His decisions in recent matches — unorthodox field placements, delayed bowling changes, and now the Brook incident — suggest a captain increasingly trying to make a statement rather than win matches.

England’s Dwindling Morale

The fallout from this match has revealed clear cracks in England’s team environment, with reports suggesting some senior players were “uncomfortable” with Stokes’ decisions. Insiders say there was even a brief dressing room discussion about whether the Brook over sent the wrong message about intent and team strategy.

What It Means for Stokes Going Forward

This incident, though dramatic, could have long-term consequences for Ben Stokes:

• His reputation as a respected captain may take a hit.
• Team unity and confidence could be at risk if such decisions continue.
• The England Cricket Board (ECB) may privately issue a word of caution to prevent further such controversies.

Ben Stokes has long been admired for his passion, grit, and willingness to take bold risks. But in the high-stakes world of Test cricket, boldness can sometimes blur into brashness. While emotions do run high, leadership demands composure, especially under pressure. Whether the Harry Brook over was a tactical experiment or a frustrated gamble, and whether the handshake snub was justified or not, Stokes’ actions have clearly divided the cricket world.

One thing is certain: the microscope is now firmly focused on Ben Stokes. And in Test cricket, every move — or misstep — is remembered.

---